I hope you're having fun.......I doubt anyone else is however, not to mention all this effort to......what exactly? The topic was Buffett, and his duplicity when it comes to talking the talk, but walking 180degrees in the other direction. But here you are expending ALL this energy, and yea, demands to how sirs defines a descriptive reference he uses to what it is to be a hard core leftist. Since its merely descriptive, I could give you lots of references and examples, but......to what end? So that you can microsemantically attempt to tear them down?
This little exercise was extended on my part to help highlight a very interesting turn of events. Yea, I'll get to the question "how does sirs define hard core leftist" in a moment. Not too long ago, I was being routinely chastised by several folks, including yourself, for supposedly badgering someone(s) to answer a question. I wasn't, as I was clearly highlighting how my questions weren't being responded to, which was fine. But I was still scolded, and even now have Xo making ongoing comments on how he's not obligated to answer anything he doesn't want to. Which again is fine. Yet look how much effort you're expending on something as so trivial as how sirs defines a descriptive term, badgering for an answer, and immediately claiming how uncomfortable I must be at having my assertions challenged because my assertions are supposedly gospel and should not be challenged. Good gravy. As even he who shall not be named referenced, I DO make an effort to back up my opinions with facts, but not necessarily mere descriptive terms, such as hard core leftist
But to placate Bt's unfaultering need to know, in sirs' descriptive OPINION, a hard core leftist is someone who pushes liberal causes, to a near blinding level. No other ideology can be considered. No objective counter-arguement to the cause can be accepted, it must be either rationalized away or simply rejected out of hand, as either radical, racist, fascist, or greedy. They support politicians who have a consistent heavy liberal voting record, and policies consistent with establishing an ever expanding bludgeoning Government footprint, all in the name of making things "fair"
It's someone who claims he pays less in taxes than his secretary, omitting the fact he's lumping 2 different taxing mechanisms, as if they were one and the same
I hope that helped. Your semantic knife awaits