What's pretty obvious to me is you are more interested in venting political anger, calling that with which you disagree, criminal.
Bush is a criminal but Stalin wasn't.
Your inconsistency is consistent.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HEY, nice distraction! STALIN? in a discussion of American war crimes in Iraq? Not bad. Of course, I am not going to get suckered into a discussion of Stalin's alleged crimes in THIS thread, so suffice to say, yes, Bush IS a war criminal and no, Stalin is not and never was. Or if he was, it was on a much lower level than Bush. Finland apart, Stalin did NOT launch a war of unprovoked aggression against anyone, unlike Bush.
And now back to our topic and sorry for that short digression, folks.
<<What's pretty obvious to me is you are more interested in venting political anger, calling that with which you disagree, criminal.
>>
Yes, congratulations, you have correctly assessed my motivation in discussing the subject: anger. I could legitimately ask you for your motivation, now that you've raised the subject, but I'm really not that interested. Would you like to get back to the topic under discussion, the relative criminality of those who instituted the war, causing hundreds of thousands of deaths, measured against that of the dumb schmuck Turner, who pulled the trigger on one fat guy on a bike?