Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Brassmask

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 18
136
3DHS / Bush Uses Obstructionism to Prove He Is "Relevant"
« on: October 17, 2007, 05:22:43 PM »
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/17/bush-i-veto-bills-to-ensure-that-i-am-relevant/

Feel that?  That's American Pride f'ing with you...

Bush: I veto bills to ?ensure that I am relevant.?Today in his press conference, President Bush attempted to justify his recent veto of an SCHIP expansion by explaining that he needs to issue vetoes in order to prove to people that he?s still the Decider:

That?s why the president has a veto. Sometimes the legislative branch wants to go on without the president, pass pieces of legislation, and the president can then use the veto to make sure he?s a part of the process. And that?s what I fully intend to do. I?m going to make sure. And that?s why when I tell you I?m going to sprint to the finish, and finish this job strong, that?s one way to ensure that I am relevant. That?s one way to ensure that I?m in the process. And I intend to use the veto.

137
3DHS / History: Don't Embarrass Israel
« on: October 09, 2007, 01:25:51 AM »
Our government would never let Americans be killed (or kill them) for some higher purpose, would they?


Veterans, documents suggest U.S., Israel didn't tell full story of deadly '67 incident
Special report
By John Crewdson
Chicago Tribune senior correspondent
baltimoresun.com
October 2, 2007

Bryce Lockwood, Marine staff sergeant, Russian-language expert, recipient of the Silver Star for heroism, ordained Baptist minister, is shouting into the phone.

"I'm angry! I'm seething with anger! Forty years, and I'm seething with anger!"

Lockwood was aboard the USS Liberty, a super-secret spy ship on station in the eastern Mediterranean, when four Israeli fighter jets flew out of the afternoon sun to strafe and bomb the virtually defenseless vessel on June 8, 1967, the fourth day of what would become known as the Six-Day War.

For Lockwood and many other survivors, the anger is mixed with incredulity: that Israel would attack an important ally, then attribute the attack to a case of mistaken identity by Israeli pilots who had confused the U.S. Navy's most distinctive ship with an Egyptian horse-cavalry transport that was half its size and had a dissimilar profile. And they're also incredulous that, for years, their own government would reject their calls for a thorough investigation. "They tried to lie their way out of it!" Lockwood shouts. "I don't believe that for a minute! You just don't shoot at a ship at sea without identifying it, making sure of your target!"

Four decades later, many of the more than two dozen Liberty survivors located and interviewed by the Tribune cannot talk about the attack without shouting or weeping.

Their anger has been stoked by the declassification of government documents and the recollections of former military personnel, including some quoted in this article for the first time, which strengthen doubts about the U.S. National Security Agency's position that it never intercepted the communications of the attacking Israeli pilots -- communications, according to those who remember seeing them, that showed the Israelis knew they were attacking an American naval vessel.

The documents also suggest that the U.S. government, anxious to spare Israel's reputation and preserve its alliance with the U.S., closed the case with what even some of its participants now say was a hasty and seriously flawed investigation.

In declassifying the most recent and largest batch of materials last June 8, the 40th anniversary of the attack, the NSA, this country's chief U.S. electronic-intelligence-gatherer and code-breaker, acknowledged that the attack had "become the center of considerable controversy and debate." It was not the agency's intention, it said, "to prove or disprove any one set of conclusions, many of which can be drawn from a thorough review of this material," available athttp://www.nsa.gov/liberty .

An Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman, Mark Regev, called the attack on the Liberty "a tragic and terrible accident, a case of mistaken identity, for which Israel has officially apologized." Israel also paid reparations of $6.7 million to the injured survivors and the families of those killed in the attack, and another $6 million for the loss of the Liberty itself.

But for those who lost their sons and husbands, neither the Israelis' apology nor the passing of time has lessened their grief.

One is Pat Blue, who still remembers having her lunch in Washington's Farragut Square park on "a beautiful June afternoon" when she was a 22-year-old secretary for a law firm.

Blue heard somebody's portable radio saying a U.S. Navy ship had been torpedoed in the eastern Mediterranean. A few weeks before, Blue's husband of two years, an Arab-language expert with the NSA, had been hurriedly dispatched overseas.

As she listened to the news report, "it just all came together." Soon afterward, the NSA confirmed that Allen Blue was among the missing.

"I never felt young again," she said.

Aircraft on the horizon

Beginning before dawn on June 8, Israeli aircraft regularly appeared on the horizon and circled the Liberty.

The Israeli Air Force had gained control of the skies on the first day of the war by destroying the Egyptian air force on the ground. America was Israel's ally, and the Israelis knew the Americans were there. The ship's mission was to monitor the communications of Israel's Arab enemies and their Soviet advisers, but not Israeli communications. The Liberty felt safe.

Then the jets started shooting at the officers and enlisted men stretched out on the deck for a lunch-hour sun bath. Theodore Arfsten, a quartermaster, remembered watching a Jewish officer cry when he saw the blue Star of David on the planes' fuselages. At first, crew members below decks had no idea whose planes were shooting at their ship.

Thirty-four died that day, including Blue, the only civilian casualty. An additional 171 were wounded in the air and sea assault by Israel, which was about to celebrate an overwhelming victory over the combined armies of Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and several other Arab states.

For most of those who survived the attack, the Six-Day War has become the defining moment of their lives.

Some mustered out of the Navy as soon as their enlistments were up. Others stayed in long enough to retire. Several went on to successful business careers. One became a Secret Service agent, another a Baltimore policeman.

Several are being treated with therapy and drugs for what has since been recognized as post-traumatic stress disorder. One has undergone more than 30 major operations. Another suffers seizures caused by a piece of shrapnel still lodged in his brain.

After Bryce Lockwood left the Marines, he worked construction, then tried selling insurance. "I'd get a job and get fired," he said. "I had a hell of a time getting my feet on the ground."

With his linguistic background, Lockwood could have had a career with the NSA, the CIA, or the FBI. But he was too angry at the U.S. government to work for it. "Don't talk to me about government!" he shouts.

U.S. Navy jets were called back

An Israeli military court of inquiry later acknowledged that their naval headquarters knew at least three hours before the attack that the odd-looking ship 13 miles off the Sinai Peninsula, sprouting more than 40 antennas capable of receiving every kind of radio transmission, was "an electromagnetic audio-surveillance ship of the U.S. Navy," a floating electronic vacuum cleaner.

The Israeli inquiry later concluded that that information had simply gotten lost, never passed along to the ground controllers who directed the air attack nor to the crews of the three Israeli torpedo boats who picked up where the air force left off, strafing the Liberty's decks with their machine guns and launching a torpedo that blew a 39-foot hole in its starboard side.

To a man, the survivors interviewed by the Tribune rejected Israel's explanation.

Nor, the survivors said, did they understand why the American 6th Fleet, which included the aircraft carriers America and Saratoga, patrolling 400 miles west of the Liberty, launched and then recalled at least two squadrons of Navy fighter-bombers that might have arrived in time to prevent the torpedo attack -- and save 26 American lives.

J.Q. "Tony" Hart, then a chief petty officer assigned to a U.S. Navy relay station in Morocco that handled communications between Washington and the 6th Fleet, remembered listening as Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, in Washington, ordered Rear Adm. Lawrence Geis, commander of the America's carrier battle group, to bring the jets home.

When Geis protested that the Liberty was under attack and needed help, Hart said, McNamara retorted that "President [Lyndon] Johnson is not going to go to war or embarrass an American ally over a few sailors."


http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20071007153106368

138
3DHS / Judge: Presidents Can't Block Docs
« on: October 02, 2007, 09:53:54 AM »
So, here's one in the win column for Americans who love government transparency. 

Hopefully, this will be a hindrance to the Clinton/Bush/Neo-con/DLC New World Order and it will now take 20 years instead of just ten for America to become a full-blown fascist police state.


Former Presidents Can't Withhold Records
Mon Oct 1, 2007 5:58 PM EDT
records, presidential-records, presidential, politics
Associated Press

WASHINGTON ? Presidents don't have indefinite veto power over which records are made public after they've left office, a federal judge ruled Monday.

In a narrowly crafted ruling, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly invalidated part of President Bush's 2001 executive order, which allowed former presidents and vice presidents to review executive records before they are released under the Freedom of Information Act.

By law, the National Archives has the final say over the release of presidential records and Kollar-Kotelly ruled that Bush's executive order "effectively eliminates" that discretion. It allows former presidents to delay the release of records "presumably indefinitely," she said.

The judge ordered the National Archives not to withhold any more documents based on that section of the executive order.

The ruling was made in a lawsuit filed by the American Historical Association and other organizations, which argued that Bush's Executive Order 13,233 was an "impermissible exercise of the executive power."

The judge dismissed most of the claims and sidestepped some of the loftier questions, such as whether the entire order was unconstitutional or whether former presidents can claim executive privilege as grounds for withholding documents.

Spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore said the White House was reviewing the opinion and considering its options.

Some historians and researches said the executive order delayed access to historical documents. The National Security Archive, a private group advocating public disclosure of government secrets, is awaiting the release of records that are being reviewed by former President Reagan's representatives. The average delay caused by a former president's review is nearly six months.

"The court is enforcing procedural standards, but has avoided the hard questions about the role former presidents, former vice presidents, and their heirs can play when it comes to disclosure of presidential records," said Meredith Fuchs, the counsel for the group. "Unless the executive order is reversed or withdrawn, decisions about the release of records from this administration may ultimately be made by the Bush daughters."

A bill that would overturn the order passed the House in March and is pending in the Senate.

http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2007/10/01/996834-former-presidents-cant-withhold-records

139
3DHS / We Could Have Given Saddam A Billion And Been Done
« on: September 27, 2007, 05:05:01 PM »
So now we find out that the alleged reason for illegally invading Iraq was not the true reason at all.  Saddam was not a threat technically, literally or any otherally.

The United States has been scammed.

All our blood and treasure have been lost for no reason whatsoever.  4000 dead soldiers because Bush and cult wanted the oil, wanted power, they wanted anything other than to get rid of Saddam Hussein because they could have just given him a Billion and not gotten anyone killed.  Instead they chose to get a lot of people kill and turn over billions to friends and family.

Saddam asked Bush for $1bn to go into exile and not be an issue any more to anyone but Bush declined.  Whatever could be the reason?



By DAVID GARDNER

Saddam Hussein offered to step down and go into exile one month before the invasion of Iraq, it was claimed last night.

Fearing defeat, Saddam was prepared to go peacefully in return for ?500million ($1billion).

The extraordinary offer was revealed yesterday in a transcript of talks in February 2003 between George Bush and the then Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar at the President's Texas ranch.

The White House refused to comment on the report last night.

But, if verified, it is certain to raise questions in Washington and London over whether the costly four-year war could have been averted.

Only yesterday, the Bush administration asked Congress for another ?100billion to finance the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

{R}


The total war bill for British taxpayers is expected to reach ?7billion by next year.

More than 3,800 American service personnel have lost their lives in Iraq, along with 170 Britons and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

However, according to the tapes, one month before he launched the invasion Mr Bush appeared convinced that Saddam was serious about going into exile.

"The Eqyptians are speaking to Saddam Hussein," said Mr Bush.

"It seems he's indicated he would be prepared to go into exile if he's allowed to take $1billion and all the information he wants about weapons of mass destruction."

Asked by the Spanish premier whether Saddam - who was executed in December last year - could really leave, the President replied: "Yes, that possibility exists. Or he might even be assassinated."

But he added that whatever happened: "We'll be in Baghdad by the end of March."

Mr Bush went on to refer optimistically to the rebuilding or Iraq.

The transcript - which was published yesterday in the Spanish newspaper El Pais - was said to have been recorded by a diplomat at the meeting in Crawford, Texas, on February 22, 2003.

Mr Bush was dismissive of the then French President Jacques Chirac, saying he "thinks he's Mr Arab".

Referring to his relationship with Downing Street, he said: "I don't mind being the bad cop if Blair is the good cop."

The President added: "Saddam won't change and he'll keep on playing games.

"The time has come to get rid of him. That's the way it is."

Days before the invasion began on March 22, 2003, the United Arab Emirates proposed to a summit of Arab leaders that Saddam and his henchmen should go into exile.

It was the first time the plan had been officially voiced but it was drowned out in the drumbeat of war.

A spokesman for Mr Aznar's foundation had no comment on its authenticity.

Bomb attacks killed 57 people in Iraq yesterday.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Find this story at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=484162&in_page_id=1811
?2007 Associated New Media

140
3DHS / Who Here Will Deny STILL That Bush Is A Liar?
« on: September 27, 2007, 10:52:11 AM »
I'm gonna post this then I will a couple of hours and check back.  During that time, try to go through all the little bullshit steps you guys always take to make it seem like Bush is not a liar.  Ok?

Let me list of those steps for you and maybe you'll just give them a miss.

Flatly state Bush didn't lie.
Ask for the exact quote where Bush lied.  (Provided in the post btw)
State that the lie statement isn't about the same subject as the released transcript.
State that the transcript is suspect in some way (maybe from later than the lie statement, maybe released by someone out to get Bush, anything!)
State that whoever released the transcript is suspect in some way (wants to make a name for themselves, wants to make money writing a book, anything!)
When all else fails, then state that Bush lied for a good reason!  (protecting troops, keeping my kid alive, 9/11, anything!)

So get that out of the way and then let's just get to the part where someone agrees that Bush lied and it was wrong.

Check the link I posted at the end for all clickable links at ThinkProgress for ProofPositive.

Ok, loveya, meanit, don'teverchange.

 Spanish Notes Reveal Bush Was Hell-Bent On War, Despite Claiming ?I?ve Not Made Up My Mind?

aznarToday, the Spanish newspaper El Pais published a transcript of a discussion between President Bush and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar in February 2003 in which Bush told Aznar that the U.S. would go to war with Iraq to disarm Saddam Hussein with or without a UN resolution:

    ?We must take him right now. We have shown an incredible degree of patience until now. There are two weeks left. In two weeks we will be militarily ready.?

Though Aznar asked Bush to ?have a little patience? and urged, ?It is very important to have a [UN] resolution,? Bush pushed for war throughout the meeting, telling the Spanish Prime Minister, ?We will be in Baghdad by the end of March.?

Just a few days later, Bush insisted to the American public that war with Iraq was not a certainty:

    BUSH: ?I?ve not made up our mind about military action. Hopefully, this can be done peacefully.? [3/6/03]

    BUSH: ?We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq. But if Saddam Hussein does not disarm peacefully, he will be disarmed by force.? [3/8/03]

Prior to going to war, Bush insisted he would get U.N. authorization. He said, ?no matter what the whip count is,? the U.S. would go to the UN and ?call for a vote.? But it?s clear Bush was never going to let the U.N. get in the way of his quest for war.

To this day, Bush has continued to insist that the ?the United States did not choose war ? the choice was Saddam Hussein?s.? In fact, as this conversation with Aznar illustrates, Bush had made his decision long before exhausting all other options.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/26/bush-aznar-talk/

141
3DHS / Cheney To Meet With SuperSecret Cabal
« on: September 26, 2007, 08:19:34 PM »
From One Bunker To Another: Dick Cheney To Address ?Super-Secret, Conservative Policy Group?
On Friday, Dick Cheney will leave his ?secure undisclosed location? to attend another one in Utah. The Salt Lake Tribune reports:

Vice President Dick Cheney will speak to a super-secret, conservative policy group in Utah on Friday during his second trip to the state this year.

The group is called the Council for National Policy, and its mission is to plot ways to advance the right-wing agenda. The council was founded in 1981 by conservative luminaries such as the Rev. Tim LaHaye (author of the ?Left Behind? series) and Paul Weyrich (who helped found the Heritage Foundation).

The council reportedly has 500 or members who pay several thousand dollars a year to ?hear private, unvarnished presentations.? Some members include Dr. James C. Dobson of Focus on the Family, the Rev. Jerry Falwell of Liberty University, and Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform.

While very little is known about the secretive group, the New York Times was able to lift the veil a slight bit in 2004. The Times wrote:

?The media should not know when or where we meet or who takes part in our programs, before of after a meeting,? a list of rules obtained by The New York Times advises the attendees.

The membership list is ?strictly confidential.? Guests may attend ?only with the unanimous approval of the executive committee.? In e-mail messages to one another, members are instructed not to refer to the organization by name, to protect against leaks.

The group apparently keeps its agenda secret for a reason ? it appears to understand it would have little support if it were shown in the light of day. From what is known about its views, CNP is vehemently anti-immigration, anti-same-sex marriage, and anti-tax. ?CNP seeded Pat Buchanan?s protest presidential candidacy in 1992.? George W. Bush spoke before the group in 1999, reportedly committing ?to appoint only anti-abortion-rights judges to the Supreme Court.? (The Bush team and CNP refused to release the audio from the event.)

Marc Ambinder reports that Mitt Romney will be attending the gathering as well.


http://thinkprogress.org/


Is Betrayus their new Smedley Butler?

Do they even need one?  'Cause they already control the nation.

142
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot

he Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was a conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.

Purported details of the matter came to light when retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testified before a Congressional committee that a group of men had attempted to recruit him to serve as the leader of a plot and to assume and wield power once the coup was successful. Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup. One of the alleged plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final report, the Congressional committee supported Butler's allegations on the existence of the plot,[2] but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and the matter was mostly forgotten.

General Butler claimed that the American Liberty League was the primary means of funding the plot. The main backers were the Du Pont family, as well as leaders of U.S. Steel, General Motors, Standard Oil, Chase National Bank, and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. A BBC documentary claims Prescott Bush, father and grandfather to the 41st and 43rd US Presidents respectively, was also connected.[3]

143
3DHS / Bad Week For Taser Lovers
« on: September 20, 2007, 02:33:18 PM »
Wheelchair-Bound Woman Dies After Being Shocked With Taser 10 Times Wed Sep 19, 9:38 AM ET
 


A Clay County woman's family said it's seeking justice after their loved one died shortly after being shocked 10 times with Taser guns during a confrontation with police.

The family of 56-year-old Emily Delafield said it would take the Green Cove Springs Police Department to court, according to a WJXT-TV report.

In April 2006, officers with the police department said they were called to a disturbance at a home in the 400 block of Harrison Street just before 5 p.m.

In a 911 call made to the Green Cove Springs, Delafield can be heard telling a dispatcher that she believed she was in danger:

Dispatcher: And what's the problem?

Delafield: My sister is waiting on my property.

Dispatcher: Your what?

Delafield: My sister (inaudible) is on my property trying to harm me.

Officers said they arrived to find Delafield in a wheelchair, armed with two knives and a hammer. Police said the woman was swinging the weapons at family members and police.

Within an hour of her call to 911, Delafield, a wheelchair-bound woman documented to have mental illness, was dead.

Family attorney Rick Alexander said Delafield's death could have been prevented and that there are four things that jump out at him about the case.

"One, she's in a wheelchair. Two, she's schizophrenic. Three, they're using a Taser on a person that's in a wheelchair, and then four is that they tasered her 10 times for a period of like two minutes," Alexander said.

According to a police report, one of the officers used her Taser gun nine times for a total of 160 seconds and the other officer discharged his Taser gun once for a total of no more than five seconds.

A medical examiner found Delafield died from hypertensive heart disease and cited the Taser gun shock as a contributing factor, the report said. On her death certificate, the medical examiner ruled Delafield's death a homicide.

The family said it plans to sue the Green Coves Springs Police Department now that it has all the reports regarding their loved one's death.

"We're going to try to compensate the estate and the family and try to get justice," Alexander said.

He said he believes the evidence weighs heavily in favor of Delafield's family and that justice will be served.

"I think that this evidence is going to show, along with some of the evidence we've collected outside of here, that there is no reason Emily Delafield should have died that day," Alexander said.

He said he plans to file a notice to sue sometime before the end of the year.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/wkmg/20070919/lo_wkmg/14147512&printer=1;_ylt=A0WTcVYKrPJGGGoAJQ_px0QC

144
3DHS / Hey, Remember that "Accidental" Armed Nuke Flight?
« on: September 20, 2007, 02:11:44 AM »
Quote
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/05/national/printable3235438.shtml


Nuke-Armed B-52 Mistakenly Flown Over U.S.
WASHINGTON, Sept. 5, 2007(AP) A B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads and flown for more than three hours across several states last week, prompting an Air Force investigation and the firing of one commander, Pentagon officials said Wednesday.

Rep. Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, called the mishandling of the weapons "deeply disturbing" and said the committee would press the military for details.

The plane was carrying Advanced Cruise Missiles from Minot Air Force Base, N.D, to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug. 30, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of a Defense Department policy not to confirm information on nuclear weapons.

The missiles, which are being decommissioned, were mounted onto pylons on the bomber's wings and it is unclear why the warheads had not been removed beforehand.

The Air Combat Command has ordered a command-wide stand down on Sept. 14 to review procedures, officials said. They said there was minimal risk to crews and the public because of safety features designed into the munitions.

In addition to the munitions squadron commander who was relieved of his duties, crews involved with the mistaken load ? including ground crew workers ? have been temporarily decertified for handling munitions, one official said.

The investigation is expected to take several weeks.

The incident was first reported in Military Times newspaper.

"There is no more serious issue than the security and proper handling of nuclear weapons," Skelton said in a statement Wednesday. "The American people, our friends, and our potential adversaries must be confident that the highest standards are in place when it comes to our nuclear arsenal."

Skelton, D-Mo., said his committee will pursue answers on the classified matter "to ensure that the Air Force and the Department of Defense address this particular incident and strengthen controls more generally."



? MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Well, a good friend sent me this link today.  http://www.legitgov.org/minot_afb_nukes_oddities.html

Those who've been in the military: Were there ever two week periods where several people where you were stationed died in "accidents"?
Quote
The following section was compiled by 'The Pundit.'
Since the Minot story broke a week ago about the missing nukeclandestine operation from Minot, we have the following (for those who are paying attention):

1. All six people listed below are from Minot Airforce base
2. All were directly involved as loaders or as pilots
3. All are now dead
4. All within the last 7 days in 'accidents' [Not all of them --LRP]

http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012
http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp
http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988
http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt
http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html

Silly me, seeing more than there is to this story. I guess this is just another coincidence.

But no doubt now that there will be more coincidences in the near future because as I have stated before, you need about fourteen signatures to get an armed nuke onto a B-52, and they may have told their wives and friends.

"The Pundit"

145
3DHS / Saltwater Can Burn
« on: September 19, 2007, 10:25:25 AM »
I've been wondering what the downside or negative is for this.  I know that there are lots of people here who just live to shoot holes in anything that may change the world for the better so I am certain that there will be lots of negativity here.

So.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6vSxR6UKFM



http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07252/815920-85.stm



Salt water as fuel? Erie man hopes so
Sunday, September 09, 2007
By David Templeton, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

For obvious reasons, scientists long have thought that salt water couldn't be burned.

So when an Erie man announced he'd ignited salt water with the radio-frequency generator he'd invented, some thought it a was a hoax.

John Kanzius, a Washington County native, tried to desalinate seawater with a generator he developed to treat cancer, and it caused a flash in the test tube.

Within days, he had the salt water in the test tube burning like a candle, as long as it was exposed to radio frequencies.

His discovery has spawned scientific interest in using the world's most abundant substance as clean fuel, among other uses.

Rustum Roy, a Penn State University chemist, held a demonstration last week at the university's Materials Research Laboratory in State College, to confirm what he'd witnessed weeks before in an Erie lab.

"It's true, it works," Dr. Roy said. "Everyone told me, 'Rustum, don't be fooled. He put electrodes in there.' "

But there are no electrodes and no gimmicks, he said.

Dr. Roy said the salt water isn't burning per se, despite appearances. The radio frequency actually weakens bonds holding together the constituents of salt water -- sodium chloride, hydrogen and oxygen -- and releases the hydrogen, which, once ignited, burns continuously when exposed to the RF energy field. Mr. Kanzius said an independent source measured the flame's temperature, which exceeds 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit, reflecting an enormous energy output.

As such, Dr. Roy, a founding member of the Materials Research Laboratory and expert in water structure, said Mr. Kanzius' discovery represents "the most remarkable in water science in 100 years."

But researching its potential will take time and money, he said. One immediate question is energy efficiency: The energy the RF generator uses vs. the energy output from burning hydrogen.

Dr. Roy said he's scheduled to meet tomorrow with U.S. Department of Energy and Department of Defense officials in Washington to discuss the discovery and seek research funding.

Mr. Kanzius said he powered a Stirling, or hot air, engine with salt water. But whether the system can power a car or be used as an efficient fuel will depend on research results.

"We will get our ideas together and check this out and see where it leads," Dr. Roy said. "The potential is huge.

"In the life sciences, the role of water is infinite, and this guy is doing something new in using the most important and most abundant material on the face of the earth."

Mr. Kanzius' discovery was an accident.

He developed the RF generator as a novel cancer treatment. His research in targeting cancer cells with metallic nanoparticles then destroying them with radio-frequency is proceeding at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and at the University of Texas' MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Manuscripts updating the cancer research are in preparation for publication in coming months, Mr. Kanzius said.

While Mr. Kanzius was demonstrating how his generator heated nanoparticles, someone noted condensation inside the test tube and suggested he try using his equipment to desalinate water.

So, Mr. Kanzius said, he put sea water in a test tube, then trained his machine on it, producing an unexpected spark. In time he and laboratory owners struck a match and ignited the water, which continued burning as long as it remained in the radio-frequency field.

During several trials, heat from burning hydrogen grew hot enough to melt the test tube, he said. Dr. Roy's tests on the machine last week provided further evidence that the process is releasing and burning hydrogen from the water. Tests on different water solutions and concentrations produced various temperatures and flame colors.

"This is the most abundant element in the world. It is everywhere," Dr. Roy said of salt water. "Seeing it burn gives me chills."

146
3DHS / Rude Student Tasered After Asking Kerry A Question
« on: September 18, 2007, 01:15:20 AM »
Maybe the guy was rude.  Maybe he wasn't.  Maybe he was an asshole.  I don't care.  They could have carried him out on over their heads.

Knees in the neck?  Tasering?  Is that appropriate?  I don't think so.

In an age where no one leads mobs in the streets, could this have been a nation of sheeps' Crispus Attucks?

Possibly.  I know I believe so.

This is not a Democrat v Republican incident.  This is not a liberal v conservative issue.  This is a ruling class v ruled class issue.  Our leaders are now kings with mercenary armies.  Those armies are made up of men and women who fear not getting their check, who fear being seen as weak.  They will do as their told by the kings till they grow weary of the kings' bullshit.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bVa6jn4rpE

147
3DHS / GOP To US: "9/11 Does Not Matter"
« on: September 10, 2007, 06:55:41 AM »
Yes, ladies and gents, the GOP has politicized the most horrible event in US history by deciding that it is better to have ObL out there, lurking, possibly powerful, possibly plotting than to pursue, prosecute and punish has as the main perpetrator of 9.11.

The GOP has decided that the double-edged sword is better at cutting their "opposition" (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) than it is at cutting themselves.  The GOP still believes that when they have ObL produce a new tape when ObL releases a new tape that their political usage of said tape stands to gain them more (saying that ObL sounds like a "lefty blogger", going on FOX and stating that they want to make sure that it is not a "trigger" for some kind of attack thus hopefully ramping up the fear they love to monger) than hurting them (Bush can't and WON'T catch ObL).

Proof, you say?

Catching bin Laden (or not)
By: Steve Benen on Saturday, September 8th, 2007 at 5:02 AM - PDT 

Fred Thompson?s reaction to today?s Osama bin Laden tape:

    ?Bin Laden is more symbolism than anything else,? he said.

Mitt Romney on bin Laden:

    [Romney] said the country would be safer by only ?a small percentage? and would see ?a very insignificant increase in safety? if al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden was caught because another terrorist would rise to power. ?It?s not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person,? Romney said.

Bush on bin Laden:

    ?I truly am not that concerned about him.?


Symbolism, says Freddie Thompson.  Yes, how would that hearten Americans that the perpetrator of the single most destructive attack in the history of the US had been caught?  Would that not send a chill down the alleged millions and millions of terrorists' (who lurk everywhere) spines?  Would they not, perhaps, be wary of carrying out any other acts if they thought that the US might move heaven and earth to find the one person who pulled off another attack?  (If your answer is no, then what is the point of A) invading Iraq and B) the Death Penalty?)

A small percentage safer, say Mittie Romney.  Aren't we after any percentage of safety we can get?  Isn't that why we should all STFU about secret spying on and wire-tapping of Americans?  How much are those programs costing both financially and in terms of civil rights and liberties in America?  That small percentage more of safety could mean one less dead soldier in Iraq.  That small percentage of safety could result in Romney's sons getting to have TWO lattes a day on the campaign trail rather than the measly ONE they are having to suffer with.  Might it not?

And Bushie says he just doesn't give a crap about ObL.  Perhaps, if I were a naive moron, I might think that Bushie is out to weaken ObL's standing.  "Bushie doesn't care about ObL because ObL is impotent and has no power and doesn't know how to pull off another 9.11."  It's the kind of schoolyard taunting tactic that scared bully utilizes after being spanked by an adult on a weaker kid.  And if the bully continues, perhaps he might get spanked by the adult again or the weaker kid may get a bunch of his friends together and they all jump the bully after school and kick the shit out of him.  Either way, the bully loses.  Unfortunately, our Bully in Chief doesn't understand it.  Bullies never do.  As the DEADWOOD character, Seth Bullock once stated to a man who was trying to take over the town, "Can?t shut up! Every bully I ever met can?t shut his ******* mouth."  After a moment of silence on the bully's part, Bullock added, "Except when he?s afraid."

When Bush stops his cocky jabberjawing, I'll know we're in trouble.

The reality of all this is obvious to all of us.  ObL is a political tool. An Eastasia or Eurasia to "fight" but never conquer or defeat.

The natural progression of thought, especially based on the reality and facts of both George W Bushie and Osama bin Laden and their families is that they are in cahoots.

Eventually, we will see Bush (or Hillary, another co-conspirator) state that we have always been friends with Osama bin Laden.

148
3DHS / Whoever is using my name at ThinkProgress
« on: August 30, 2007, 11:06:00 AM »
You're a fucking moron and if I find out who it is, you are going to regret it for the rest of your life.

149
3DHS / Alberto Gone-zales
« on: August 27, 2007, 09:45:28 AM »
It will take twenty years to repair the damage wrought by this "administration".  This is just the barest minimum of the beginning.

Karen Hughes is still haunting the State Department, but this is the last of the Texas shitbirds that came with Bush. 


Embattled Attorney General Resigns

Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, whose tenure has been marred by controversy and accusations of perjury before Congress, has resigned. A senior administration official said he would announce the decision later this morning in Washington.



http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/27/washington/27cnd-gonzales.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

150
3DHS / Welcome to Pottersville
« on: August 17, 2007, 06:03:15 PM »
Hello you old savings and loan!  At least we'll be able to start on the new RBE when the world goes to hell in a handbasket!

This is kind of what happens when robber barons make out like gangbusters.  Conservatism is having its way.  You must all be beaming with pride.

Run on banks in LA amid crisis; Wal-Mart CEO says customers are 'running out of money'
08/17/2007 @ 9:23 am
Filed by John Byrne

Wal-Mart CEO H. Lee Scott Jr. says customers are "running out of money."

Earlier this week, consumer juggernauts Home Depot and Wal-Mart reported softer than expected earnings.

Penned the New York Times, "the sober forecasts reverberated across Wall Street, sending the Dow Jones industrial average and the Standard & Poor?s 500-stock index down by nearly 2 percent, with the Dow dropping more than 200 points. Shares of both Wal-Mart and Home Depot fell around 5 percent.

"Economists said the sluggish performance of the chains ? Wal-Mart missed its profit forecast and Home Depot?s earnings dropped ? could signal broader troubles in the economy."

Buried in the article was a sobering remark indeed: ?Many customers are running out of money at the end of the month,? said H. Lee Scott Jr., the chief executive of Wal-Mart.

In Los Angeles, economic concerns hit close to home.

Anxious customers of Countrywide Bank jammed its phone lines, branches and website after the nation's largest mortgage lender -- which owns the bank -- announced it was facing problems from a credit meltdown.

"Countrywide Financial Corp., the biggest home-loan company in the nation, sought Thursday to assure depositors and the financial industry that both it and its bank were fiscally stable," wrote the LA Times Friday. "And federal regulators said they weren't alarmed by the volume of withdrawals from the bank."

Penned the New York Times, "the sober forecasts reverberated across Wall Street, sending the Dow Jones industrial average and the Standard & Poor?s 500-stock index down by nearly 2 percent, with the Dow dropping more than 200 points. Shares of both Wal-Mart and Home Depot fell around 5 percent.

"Economists said the sluggish performance of the chains ? Wal-Mart missed its profit forecast and Home Depot?s earnings dropped ? could signal broader troubles in the economy."

Buried in the article was a sobering remark indeed: ?Many customers are running out of money at the end of the month,? said H. Lee Scott Jr., the chief executive of Wal-Mart.

In Los Angeles, economic concerns hit close to home.

Anxious customers of Countrywide Bank jammed its phone lines, branches and website after the nation's largest mortgage lender -- which owns the bank -- announced it was facing problems from a credit meltdown.

"Countrywide Financial Corp., the biggest home-loan company in the nation, sought Thursday to assure depositors and the financial industry that both it and its bank were fiscally stable," wrote the LA Times Friday. "And federal regulators said they weren't alarmed by the volume of withdrawals from the bank."


"The rush to withdraw money -- by depositors that included a former Los Angeles Kings star hockey player and an executive of a rival home-loan company -- came a day after fears arose that Countrywide Financial could file for bankruptcy protection because of a worsening credit crunch stemming from the sub-prime mortgage meltdown," the paper continued.

"At Countrywide Bank offices, in a scene rare since the U.S. savings-and-loan crisis ended in the early '90s, so many people showed up to take out some or all of their money that in some cases they had to leave their names," the Times added. "Bill Ashmore drove his Porsche Cayenne to Countrywide's Laguna Niguel office and waited half an hour to cash out $500,000, which he then wired to an account at Bank of America."

"It's because of the fear of the bankruptcy," Ashmore, president of Irvine's Impac Mortgage Holdings, which escaped bankruptcy itself recently by shutting down virtually all its lending and laying off hundreds of employees told the paper. "It's got my wife totally freaked out. I just don't want to deal with it. I don't care about losing 90 days' interest, I don't care if it's FDIC-insured -- I just want it out."

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 18