<<LOL....so if it's "published all over the place", surely just 1 could be re-posted here, right? Grin >>
No, wrong. <grin>
Nobody is dumb enough to indulge your fucking laziness and go back into the archives to perform the same search that you yourself are fully capable of doing.
<< But don't worry, I realize, you, Brass, & Tee have zip on this, outside of your continuined perseveration of the accusation itself & the selected distortion of events on the ground. >>
Uh, what we have on this is logical factual proof that it is much, much more likely that Bush lied deliberately in stating his reasons for war than that he was "honestly mistaken." In fact at this point it's almost inconceivable that there was any "honest mistake" involved at all. The pattern of deception runs from A to Z - - from the PNAC "need for a new Pearl Harbor" through the Sept. 11 attacks and the "can't wait for the mushroom cloud" to the invasion itself. WE have no problem with evidence of Bush's deliberate lies, it's YOU who has the problem of proving "honest mistake."
<< Just good we can get you folks to reinforce that from time to time>>
Yeah, right, sirs. Whatever. It's GOOD that nobody is taken in by your self-serving and asinine views of what's good or who is reinforcing what. Rave on, my friend. You aren't fooling anyone.