WHY is it NOT "reasonable to assume" that some or all on the list of countries contributing to America's effort in Iraq were bribed or threatened into doing so by the USA?
Because, because minus any EVIDENCE to prove such an accusaion, would require not only a country who's Government personified that of the Sopranos, but an electorate that supported it as well.
That's why to you and your egregiously false premice mindset of just how evil Bush and America is, allows you to actually consider such a scenario as "reasonable". It's something along the lines of what Bernie Goldberg has articulated, over the last few years, as it relates to media bias. When you get alot of like minded folks in the same room, all largely thinking the same thing, that no matter how whaked out that thought process may be, it can actually be rationalized as rational, hell, even mainstream thought, because....hey everyone else is thinking it (in the room), so it must be true.
