Author Topic: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat  (Read 43757 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #105 on: April 26, 2011, 08:17:39 PM »
Murdering is against the law

Obamacare is legaleze

Your answer is in the semantics.  I'm a rule of law guy...not a rule of leagalize guy

Interesting.

Law to you is Judeo Christian scriptural law.

What is your position on Sharia Law?

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #106 on: April 26, 2011, 08:21:43 PM »
Quote
Younger and smaller Premies are rescued every year as science continues to learnbetter how to rescue them .

I would guess the definition of viable is flexible enough to still be operable even with medical advances.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #107 on: April 26, 2011, 11:30:47 PM »
By leave the womb, I meant by both natural and surgical means of course.

  Then Abortion itself is Birth!

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #108 on: April 26, 2011, 11:35:30 PM »
If you cannot tell a fetus from a baby, then it follows that you cannot tell a birth from an abortion.

So I am not surprised.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #109 on: April 26, 2011, 11:40:24 PM »
If you cannot tell a fetus from a baby, then it follows that you cannot tell a birth from an abortion.

So I am not surprised.

Tell me what then the diffrence between Fetus and baby is?

Remember, I am going for reality and logic.

We can get to scripture later.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #110 on: April 26, 2011, 11:43:46 PM »
Murdering is against the law

Obamacare is legaleze

Your answer is in the semantics.  I'm a rule of law guy...not a rule of leagalize guy


Interesting.

Law to you is Judeo Christian scriptural law.


Law to me, is law.  American, in particular


What is your position on Sharia Law?

Don't have one outside of keep it outside of America
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #111 on: April 26, 2011, 11:46:17 PM »
Tell me what then the diffrence between Fetus and baby is?

==================================================
A living fetus is invisible, since it is still in the womb.

A baby is not inside a womb, and may be alive or dead.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #112 on: April 27, 2011, 12:03:11 AM »
Tell me what then the diffrence between Fetus and baby is?

==================================================
A living fetus is invisible, since it is still in the womb.

A baby is not inside a womb, and may be alive or dead.

Is the whole diffrence that you have not had a chance to look at it?

I am missing the reality and the logic.

You have not stated any diffrence except one of position, and again an abortion itself would be a birth, Converting the invisible to the visible.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #113 on: April 27, 2011, 12:04:37 AM »
Quote
Younger and smaller Premies are rescued every year as science continues to learnbetter how to rescue them .

I would guess the definition of viable is flexible enough to still be operable even with medical advances.

When it flexes all the way to conception will it still be a viable differention?

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #114 on: April 27, 2011, 12:07:32 AM »
Murdering is against the law

Obamacare is legaleze

Your answer is in the semantics.  I'm a rule of law guy...not a rule of leagalize guy

Interesting.

Law to you is Judeo Christian scriptural law.

What is your position on Sharia Law?

  Is the diffrence between right and wrong  a matter of logic , science or tradition?

Sharia Law is better than amorality.

I prefer US traditions of Law mostly , but we are behind the advancement of Sharia Law when it comes to abortion.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #115 on: April 27, 2011, 12:11:36 AM »
hmm

since I wasn`t around then

would that person 60 years ago get any help at all or simply be left in the alley to die. do people die alot in alleys in the 50`s??

the last time I recall somebody died in a alley was 20 years ago.

the whole point of hate crime laws is to finally get the police involved in a crime involving certain people who tend to die in alleys..

no proof those laws work,but most definitely no proof it doesn`t- meaning people are dying less in alleys today

     I don't think there should be a diffrence without haveing a result in mind.
     People who leave you dieing in an alley for greeds sake do not deserve a break above someone doing the same for racisms sake.

     What is the result that is hoped for ? Makeing muggers colorblind?

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #116 on: April 27, 2011, 12:53:17 AM »
Quote
Law to me, is law.  American, in particular

Then why would ObamaCare not be law and merely legalese?

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #117 on: April 27, 2011, 12:55:49 AM »
Quote
When it flexes all the way to conception will it still be a viable differention?

At that point there would be no legal abortions, as currently defined.


BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #118 on: April 27, 2011, 12:56:54 AM »
Murdering is against the law

Obamacare is legaleze

Your answer is in the semantics.  I'm a rule of law guy...not a rule of leagalize guy

Interesting.

Law to you is Judeo Christian scriptural law.

What is your position on Sharia Law?

  Is the diffrence between right and wrong  a matter of logic , science or tradition?

Sharia Law is better than amorality.

I prefer US traditions of Law mostly , but we are behind the advancement of Sharia Law when it comes to abortion.

Thank you for understanding my point.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #119 on: April 27, 2011, 01:30:34 AM »
Quote
Law to me, is law.  American, in particular

Then why would ObamaCare not be law and merely legalese?

I realize the effort to make this a semantic arguement.  I'm not going to play.  Law is law.  Obamacare is currently law.  But it is saturated with 2000+ pages of legalize.  You're a smart guy Bt.  You know what I'm referring to, when I'm referencing legalize.  It's law with a A WHOLE HELL of a lot of legal jargon thrown it.  The fact you were using it to try and defend your inconsistent position as it relates to abortion is the reason I brought it up.  I gave you the opportunity to answer a simple question, with a 1 sentence answer, and you posted an Obama-like dissertation on a legal ruling, full of legalize.  Then said your answer was that.  I merely called you on it
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle