Author Topic: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat  (Read 43748 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #180 on: April 30, 2011, 04:57:45 AM »
Defense is protection....as best as the Government can provide.  Especially those who can't

Defense is for the sovereign nation, not its individual citizens.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #181 on: April 30, 2011, 05:07:09 AM »
The individual citizens is what makes up this sovereign nation.  Do we want to start a laundry list of all the laws and regulations, just at the Federal level, of the government trying to "protect us"??
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #182 on: April 30, 2011, 05:11:00 AM »
Which makes you feel safer ? Your government issued body guard or that firearm you carry?

Oh wait. You don't have a bodyguard.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #183 on: April 30, 2011, 05:20:13 AM »
Nor do I expect one.  The Government isn't a personal security service.  Then again, we've already addressed that.  Circle now complete.  Time to move on
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #184 on: April 30, 2011, 05:33:59 AM »
Nor do I expect one.  The Government isn't a personal security service.  Then again, we've already addressed that.  Circle now complete.  Time to move on

Then why use that argument when it comes to the unborn?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #185 on: April 30, 2011, 05:40:19 AM »
Because they can't protect themselves.  I, on the other hand, can protect myself.  As I said, your inconsistency has been established....time to move on
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #186 on: April 30, 2011, 05:46:59 AM »
Because they can't protect themselves.  I, on the other hand, can protect myself.  As I said, your inconsistency has been established....time to move on

So who protects the rights of the mother?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #187 on: April 30, 2011, 01:53:17 PM »
A SIG Sauer, if she so choses
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #188 on: April 30, 2011, 02:14:04 PM »
A SIG Sauer, if she so choses

So she should shoot anyone who stands in her way of obtaining a legal abortion?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #189 on: April 30, 2011, 02:18:47 PM »
How is that, in any way defending herself, from physical harm, which is what the protection in question, is all about???
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #190 on: April 30, 2011, 02:24:08 PM »
My question was who protects her rights.

Quote
So who protects the rights of the mother?

You said she does with a gun.
Quote
A SIG Sauer, if she so choses

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #191 on: April 30, 2011, 02:35:03 PM »
If her life is not in danger, you could say the Government....which brings us back full circle to who protects the life of the unborn child, which your RvW gives us the vague designation of viability as when being considered a person......let's go with 25weeks, for a buffer
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #192 on: April 30, 2011, 03:08:23 PM »
If her life is not in danger, you could say the Government....which brings us back full circle to who protects the life of the unborn child, which your RvW gives us the vague designation of viability as when being considered a person......let's go with 25weeks, for a buffer

The same govt that protects her rights would be responsible for protecting the life of a viable unborn.

So how do you propose they do it?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #193 on: April 30, 2011, 03:55:49 PM »
Danger in loss of life comes 1st
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The myth of the "pro-life" Democrat
« Reply #194 on: April 30, 2011, 04:14:52 PM »
Danger in loss of life comes 1st

Is that your answer?

According to Scotus life begins at the point of viability.

So how do you propose they protect a viable unborn?