You keep acting like Israel would be the victim of an attack instead of the aggressor. Are you aware of the history of the 67 war? Israel preemptively attacked Egypt and wiped out their entire airforce in a surprise attack.
Are YOU?? The attack was based on the prearranging of the Arab forces, in preparing to attack Israel. Israel has no reason to attack or even be an "aggressor" so long as there's an established peace. Arab countries and Islamic terrorists leave Israel alone, Israel then leaves everyone else alone. Not to mention, that my repercussions include contingencies on Israel supposedly "acting mischievous"
You're not trying to rewrite history now, are you?? You make it sound like Israel, for the sheer hell of it, attacked Egypt. Is that what you think happened??
Yeah let's talk about your starting points where ultimately Israel gives up any gains achieved by the 67 war, far more concilliatory than I am. And then once an agreement is reach you want to enforce it with UN or NATO troops as some type of peace keeping mission, being very vague as to who bears the ongoing costs of maintaining that force.
Never said easy, just doable. And the NATO troops are not there as a "peace keeping force"...in fact, they're not even there. Their mandate, who ever else it is, is also very clear. They are merely given the authorization to use as much force, as needed, upon the total repercussion references of Command & Control, Communications, etc. It's to be swift & total. HARDLY the vague inference of some UN peace keeping force that watches while 2 sides keep attacking each other, while soaking up more tax dollars.
And here's the kicker......THAT'S NOT EVEN THE STARTING POINT. So, you either ignored it, or lets give you the benefit of the doubt, you missed it. Lemme give you a hint, a starting point is that in which something 1st must happen.....a before b.
The starting point, AGAIN, is that Hamas must remove from its charter, the total destruction and death of Jews and the Jewish state of Israel.
One can NOT negotiate with the other "state", if the others agenda is the death of the Israeli state. At the very least, the Palestinian President must stand in front of his people and proclaim the right of Israel to exist in this 2 state configuration
My solution is simple. Reach an agreement on borders of the two states and the duo of Russia and the US will guarantee the integrity of both borders because zero belligerence from either party will be tolerated.
....WITH NUKES........(read nonstarter). If you want to be serious about discussing the peace process in the middle east, I'd recommend starting with a serious position that has a basis in reality
