'Bout Time

[Christians4LessGvt]

HE HAD EVERY LEGAL RIGHT TO CARRY and GET OUT OF HIS CAR.....PERIOD

SIRS.....thought you might find this interesting....



Most Americans back right
to use deadly force: poll

http://www.edmontonsun.com/2012/04/13/most-americans-back-right-to-use-deadly-force-poll

[Christians4LessGvt]

  Mine would be a Sig, not a Roscoe.  Can't vouch for Cu4

SW 38 Special (nightstand)


SW 357 Magnum w/laser sight (desk/office)


Mossberg Riot Saw-offed Shotgun w/pistol grip handle & laser sight (Work-Closet)


MAK-90 with Clinton Banned 30 Round Clips - Master Closet Home
Well over 1000 rounds


Remington Speedmaster 22 Semi-Auto Rifle - Farm

[Xavier_Onassis]

So, will you be lending one of those to Zimmerman if they don't give his back?

[Christians4LessGvt]

So, will you be lending one of those to Zimmerman if they don't give his back?

I don't loan my guns out.

If the Hispanic guy is found not guilty I hope he (like me) has
tear gas/pepper spray as his first line of defense in the future.

[Xavier_Onassis]

So your personal possession of firearms is more important than the principle that everyone go about packing heat.

Probably a rational decision. I agree that Zimmerman should have been carrying pepper spray rather than a pistol.

[BSB]

"BSB that really crosses the line of decency & you should apologize."

CU4, your decisions on when people have crossed the line of decency are a bit odd. When your buddy Kramer continually made reference to certain physical peculiarities of mine you remained silent. Further, you claimed that those comments were OK because my service record was doubtful. In other words not only didn't you ask Kramer to apologize, you give him your blessing and called me a liar.

When your colleague sirs can put up a string of posts that while they may differ from others opinion wise they are cogent and respectful, I'll congratulate him. Until then he's free game.

This place should be fun. You shouldn't have to continuely read posts that make you feel like you'd rather get a needle in the eye than continue reading. 

BSB

[Xavier_Onassis]

Again to have EVERY LEGAL RIGHT to do something stupid does not mean that one is obliged to do something stupid. We all have every right to fart in elevators even when we know that we are armed with sulfurous SBD's (Silent but Deadly).

sirs is so utterly annoying, I am going to agree with BSB on this one.

 I, too am tired of the stupid Reagan quote, and the stupid Reagan picture as well.

[Christians4LessGvt]

CU4, your decisions on when people have crossed the line of decency are a bit odd.

Not really.... to call a fellow 3DHS member a "fucking dumb asshole"
does cross the line of decency no matter what excuse or justification of:
"well so & so that got banned/suspended did something to me some time ago".

When your buddy Kramer continually made reference to certain physical peculiarities of
mine you remained silent.

Look I am not going to spend a whole lot of time searching proving you are wrong once again,
except you are flat wrong when you say I "have remained silent" as far as attacks on you.
Here are just a few I found in a quick search......

BSB in fact I have defended you saying you should not be banned and I called people out for
saying hurtful things to you concerning your service to our country. My exact words were:
"I also think Michael sometimes tries to be hurtful to BSB about his service to the country"
http://debategate.com/new3dhs/index.php?topic=9943.msg104168#msg104168

BSB I have also posted that Kramer should be more civil towards you.

"I would advise Kramer that when XO, BSB, or Tee piss him off with their insulting
but I suppose more civil way take a deep breath and beat them at their own game.
Be nice conversationally"
http://debategate.com/new3dhs/index.php?topic=16135.15

And BSB I also posted
Kramer really shouldn't make fun of whatever disability you have...."
http://debategate.com/new3dhs/index.php?topic=16135.30

So you see you are wrong about me being silent,
and really BSB dont ya think SIRS is not Kramer
and deserves to not be called a "fucking dumb asshole"?
When has SIRS ever insulted you in that manner?

If it makes you feel better I will apologize if I didnt stand up for
you enough in the past...but you should apologize to SIRS.

[BSB]

Good lord, you lay down with dogs you get up with flees.

1. You only spoke up AFTER Kramer had been tossed for it. While it was going on you said NOTHING, ZIP, NADA. 

2. In one of the post of yours that you reference you will see where you said that Kramer made the comments about a disability because he might not have believed it was true. Kramer never said that, he never implied that, nor did he believe that. He said what he said because he knew it was true. Therefore any BS about it not being true you pulled out of your ass.

3. I'm not making any excuses about what I said to sirs because there's nothing to excuse. He had it coming and I'd be perfectly happy to repeat it.

Just because you see life trough an antiquated pair of cheap binoculars that blur anything beyond the rail on your front porch, CU4, don't think the rest of us are so limited.


BSB


P.S. If you need the last word, by all means, have at it. After that, think we could move on?

[Christians4LessGvt]

After proving you wrong about me being "silent"
all we get are more excuses & justifications for such lame behavior
as calling someone as civil as SIRS a "fucking dumb asshole".
It's not even about me, Kramer, or others...it's about what YOU said to SIRS.
Diversion tactics about the past can not hide your own present day indecency.
The fact remains that SIRS never has attacked you in such a vile manner...NEVER!
but somehow you justify your non-sense by calling out others...
All it does is say a heck of a lot about you as a person.
And as long as that came out, yeah I am happy to "move on".

[Xavier_Onassis]

I am thinking that it is silly when A demands that B apologize to C because B has said something that A feels is wrong.

At best, (unless A is B's mother, mentor or guru)  it would tend evoke an insincere apology.

[sirs]

I didn't anything about rights you fucking dumb asshole.

I DID.  You best get some rest, as your ability to debate this issue is sorely lacking

P.S. and get rid of that stupid Reagan quote, we've all read it 50,000,000 times.

Hits a little too close to home??  Don't like it.......don't read it.  Not a hard concept



PS....thanks C, for the assist, while was I vacationing in the mountains, with a group of friends.  And here's a staggering fact for our fellow anti Bill-of-righters B & Xo, I had my weapon wth me at all times.  Never once had to reach for it, ever once had to "brandish it", never once had to mention I even had it.  In fact no one knew I had it with me.  Pretty incredible how this "gun nut" could manage it, not shooting at anyone, doncha think?       

[BSB]

Sirs, I'd like to take a moment to express my heart felt apology for singling you out. I was wrong. The real truth is both you and CU4 are dumb fucking assholes.


BSB

P.S. Imagine being so fearful that you need to pack a weapon when going hiking with friends? And than imagine pointing out the fact that you didn't brandish it?

Good Lord.

[Christians4LessGvt]

I am thinking that it is silly when A demands that B apologize to C

Can you ever get facts correct?
No one "demanded" anything,
but nice try at changing reality to fit your fantasy land.

[sirs]

Sirs, I'd like to take a moment to express my heart felt apology for singling you out. I was wrong. The real truth is both you and CU4 are dumb fucking assholes.

BSB

P.S. Imagine being so fearful that you need to pack a weapon when going hiking with friends? And than imagine pointing out the fact that you didn't brandish it?

Let's take a rather astute look at the latest effort at "debating this issue", by our resident elitist know-it-all

Not only is it down to the levels of xO-like namecalling in bplace of debate, but adds the idiocy of thinking this "gun nut" was ready to defend himself from his friends. 

Here's a newsflash B.....most of the time, we normal folks, who are at risk from some imminent danger. if not death, is from something, NOT a friend.  Nor is being prepared some twisted notion of "fearful".  USUALLY, danger is from a source, either a criminal or possibly a wild animal that is threatening me, my loved ones, or my friends.  I mean, I realize that's a really strange concept, the idea of defending oneself.  But it does kinda throw your whole "gun nut" perversion, into the debate trash heap, since I somehow managed not to either brandish it, point it, or even mention it