Did anyone miss the fact that the reason she said "That's so gay" was because she was being hassled about her religion?
The answer to Lanya's question is "nothing." Unless, of course, the person was a member of a non-Christian faith.
The entire emphasis of this article is on how the Mormon was using a terrible term (which, in fact, is a term currently in vogue. Several of my daughter's HS friends use it to mean "strange" or "stupid" - including my daughter who is a member of the Gay-Straight Alliance.). Nobody seems upset that this girl was being dogged out about her faith - to include the use of inaccurate stereotypes.
It's very typical that two wrongs (which, of course, don't make a right) were committed but only one was punished. This young girl is being painted as a homophobic "fundi" (the latter of which, of coiurse, she can't be) instead of a kid who was getting teased about her religion and used a common term to defend herself.
Years ago, my youngest son (who's in college now) was harrassed by someone about his religion. Among other things, they said that all Mormons were misogynistic because we believe in traditional gender roles. One thing lead to another and finally he ended up in the office. He said it was wrong to stereotrype all Mormons. The principle said "But that's what Mormons are." He told her "That's like saying all Muslims are terrorists," She promptly told him that THAT was an inappropriate comment, because it stereotyped Muslims. He told her that was his point - Mormons shouldn't be stereotyped any more than Muslims. "No, it's different." was her reply. Some religions are, apparently, privileged. So are some classes of people. This is a perfect example of special - as opposed to equal - rights for gays.
Thanks for the wb, Plane!