CNN Wolf Blitzer: If Sequestration Is So Horrible, Why Did Obama Propose it?

[sirs]

Good gravy, the fact that any "cuts" the Dems are referring to are merely cuts in the rate of GROWTH, as in non-existent cuts.

[BSB]

Sirs apparently feels that the constitution protects him from common sense.


BSB

[BSB]

......and work.


BSB

[sirs]

Wrong......and wrong.......but then again, one must consider the source of the perseverative mere say so

[Christians4LessGvt]

[sirs]

I couldn't

[BSB]

The thing about the sequester is it's like man made global warming. If and when it happens we'll find out who was right and who was wrong.


BSB

[Plane]

We already know who wrote the thing, and the same bunch are busy calling it the worst event in all history.

So what are we waiting for ?

The thing about the sequester is it's like man made global warming. If and when it happens we'll find out who was right and who was wrong.


BSB

[BSB]

It's obvious, to those who can read, that I posted about its effect if it happens, not about who wrote it and who voted for it. See, CU has been talking about the effect.

Try reality, you might like it. Then again you probably wouldn't.   

BSB

[Plane]

It's obvious, to those who can read, that I posted about its effect if it happens, not about who wrote it and who voted for it. See, CU has been talking about the effect.

Try reality, you might like it. Then again you probably wouldn't.   

BSB

What the boss is telling me is that I can expect a 20% pay cut in the form of frequent unpaid days off.

I hope this does not become reality , I don't expect to like it.

The thread heading tricked me into thinking the author of the problem was something pertanant to the thread.

And who was wrong?

Posted by: BSB
« on: Today at 01:16:29 AM »Insert Quote


The thing about the sequester is it's like man made global warming. If and when it happens we'll find out who was right and who was wrong.


BSB

I am betting the President will regret the sequester, if he is unsuccessfull in blaming it all on someone elese.

[Xavier_Onassis]

It it happens, pretty much everyone will blame the "Party of No". 

Now....with extra obstinacy and two scoops more of stupidity.

[Plane]

It it happens, pretty much everyone will blame the "Party of No". 

Now....with extra obstinacy and two scoops more of stupidity.

Why not blame the originator of the idea?

Or blame the President for not allowing any halfway measures?

I think I like the party of "NO " better than the person of "We will do it "My Way"".

[sirs]

It it happens, pretty much everyone will blame the "Party of No". 

Ahhh, you mean the Senate Democrats that has House bill after House bill, after House bill, sitting on Reid's desk, gathering dust, not even being allowed to vote on, and has yet to pass a budget since........the last administration

Yes, indeed, the party of "no"

[Xavier_Onassis]

The bills that the GOP has submitted are bogus garbage that not even a majority of Republican'ts would vote for.

In any event, if the sequester hurts the voters, most of them are DEFINITELY going to blame the GOP and the annoying 'baggers.

And rightly so.

[sirs]

If they are "bogus garbage", let them be voted on, so everyone can see.  But no, the Party of no has said we're not even going to do that

Yes indeed, we'll blame the party of no