It made no real sense . true
<<It was nuts , true
<<Stalin did it senselessly adn because he was nuts this is all true.>>
Well, at least I am hearing new historical theories here. Stalin was nuts? You have the diagnosis of a respected medical practitioner who examined Stalin in the 1930s when all these events took place and determined that there was a mental illness?
I didn't think you did.
If Stalin was so mentally ill that he radically endangered the U.S.S.R. even in peace-time, how did this dangerous lunatic manage not only to survive 4 years of warfare with Nazi Germany but to win the war in the end? Quite an accomplishment for a dangerous lunatic?
Plane, "he was nuts" is the usual bullshit that U.S. propaganda employs when it wants to spread a lie that is so obviously untrue that even a child can see through it. "Why would Saddam Hussein, even if he HAD nukes, want to use them against the U.S. or give them to somebody else to use against the U.S., when either course of action would result in the incineration of him and his whole fucking country?" Zio-Nazi answer: "Because he was nuts."
Similarly, why would Stalin decimate his own army on the eve of war, starve his own miners, farmers and urban proletariat to death? Cold War propaganda answer: "Because he was nuts."
Come on, plane, cut the bullshit and try to form the semblance of a logical answer.
<<You cannot argue that Stalin did not do it because it would have been stupid of him to do , I simply then agree that Stalin was stupid that way.>>
LOL. Sure, you'd have to agree that the Central Committee was also stupid, because Stalin was only the Chairman of the Central Committee of the Party, which included a lot of powerful Revolutionary leaders at the time. I guess "they were all stupid" is your only recourse now, or "they were all insane." Give it up, plane, you'll never pull this crap off.
<<Did Hitler get accused of killing a lot of productive citizens too just because they were Jews ? this was a dumb thing and of course he did not do it because he wasn't dumb that way.>>
Yeah, he did. Albert Speer in Inside the Third Reich says precisely that.
<<Oh wait after he lost the war his records of doing just that exact dumb thing in a big way were availible.>>
It wasn't a secret. Most of the top scientists on the Manhattan Project, for example, were Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany who escaped with their lives. My mum didn't need secret Nazi records to figure out what happened to her aunts, uncles and cousins in Poland. The survivors knew. You're really living in some fantasy world that just doesn't seem to correspond with the real world in any way, at least that's how it seems when you opine on matters related to WWII.
<<It is a matter of record, just try to find records you and I both trust.>>
Well, if there are no reliable records, then it's not a matter of record at all, is it?
<<Stalin was able to cover his tracks better than Hitler was.>>
You're making one helluva big assumption, that there WERE tracks for Stalin to cover. OK, it's possible. Anything is possible, but on the basis of what I know today, I have to say that Stalin has little if anything to apologize for. He was in a real jungle, and he did what he had to do to assure his own survival and that of the Revolution in that environment.