The Muslim Brotherhood is the enemy

[sirs]

So, now that we have a source, how do you intend to tear it down or minimize it?  I'm sure we can find other sources, if you wish

[BT]

So, now that we have a source, how do you intend to tear it down or minimize it?  I'm sure we can find other sources, if you wish

Since the charge was that the Muslim Brotherhood assassinated Sadat, perhaps you can show the link between those charged with the assassination and the brotherhood. BTW what radio program did you hear this on?

[sirs]

I provided you a source, that you demanded.  The radio station was 640 KFI

[BT]

I provided you a source, that you demanded.  The radio station was 640 KFI

What program?

[sirs]

I think it was with a fella named Handel, but he was interviewing a former military officer who reported the Sadat/MB news

[Christians4LessGvt]

show the link between those charged with the assassination and the brotherhood.

"The attackers would eventually come to be identified as Islamist nationalists
associated with the Muslim Brotherhood under the name of Islamic Jihad"
http://middleeast.about.com/od/egypt/a/me081006a.htm

"since the October 1981 assassination of his predecessor, Anwar Sadat,
by followers of a Muslim Brotherhood splinter group"
http://www.newsweek.com/2011/02/06/among-the-believers.html

"Jamaat al-Islamiyya (Sadat's killers) is Egypt's largest Islamist militant organization .....
a radical offshoot of the much older and more grassroots-oriented Muslim Brotherhood"
http://www.cfr.org/egypt/jamaat-al-islamiyya/p9156


Did the Muslim Brotherhood kill Anwar Sadat ?

[BT]

So if i am reading this correctly, those charged with killing Sadat were from a splinter group or offshoot of the Musalim Brotherhood. They weren't members of the Muslim Brotherhood itself.

So then the next question is why did these groups splinter from the brotherhood? Was there a philosophical difference in how best to achieve their goals? If so , what was that difference.

[sirs]

Actually a question just as important, if not more so, is did MB itself condemn the act, publically distancing themselves from the actions of a completely indep group, with a different philosophy

[Christians4LessGvt]

So if i am reading this correctly, those charged with killing Sadat were from
a splinter group or offshoot of the Musalim Brotherhood. They weren't members
of the Muslim Brotherhood itself.

You asked for Sadat's killer's link to the Muslim Brotherhood.
I gave it to you.

So then the next question

LOL....I knew that was coming since the last one didnt work out to well!
 

why did these groups splinter from the brotherhood?

Who knows?
IslamoNazis splinter off alot.
Many times they disagree about the best way to kill us &/or imprison us in their so called religion.
After they are done killing us they will probably kill each other.
But IslamoNazis are already doing a pretty good job killing each other

[BT]

Actually a question just as important, if not more so, is did MB itself condemn the act, publically distancing themselves from the actions of a completely indep group, with a different philosophy

The Muslim Brotherhood is under no obligation to condemn actions it is not responsible for, just as you are under no obligation to condemn the actions of a few at Abu Ghraib wearing the uniform of your country.

[BT]

So if i am reading this correctly, those charged with killing Sadat were from
a splinter group or offshoot of the Musalim Brotherhood. They weren't members
of the Muslim Brotherhood itself.

You asked for Sadat's killer's link to the Muslim Brotherhood.
I gave it to you.

So then the next question

LOL....I knew that was coming since the last one didnt work out to well!
 

why did these groups splinter from the brotherhood?

Who knows?
IslamoNazis splinter off alot.
Many times they disagree about the best way to kill us &/or imprison us in their so called religion.
After they are done killing us they will probably kill each other.
But IslamoNazis are already doing a pretty good job killing each other

So if the split was over the use of violence to achieve political ends, that wouldn't matter?

[Christians4LessGvt]

BT...like I said who knows?
The IslamoNazis that want to take over the world come in all forms.
It takes alot of different players to put the ball in the endzone.
They aren't all strapping suicide vests on....
Some play different roles so they can reach their goals
They are good at "hiding"
In fact that's what makes them so difficult to beat
My niece died of leukemia a few years ago...
The doctor told us the cancer would run hide in her brain when he cranked up the poison (chemo)
The leukemia knew it could hide in the brain because the doc couldn't poison her brain
The IslamoNazis do the same....they blend in...they hide...they shoot rockets from schools...
In my mind they have the same goal as the cancer....kill the host.

[sirs]

Actually a question just as important, if not more so, is did MB itself condemn the act, publically distancing themselves from the actions of a completely indep group, with a different philosophy

The Muslim Brotherhood is under no obligation to condemn actions it is not responsible for, just as you are under no obligation to condemn the actions of a few at Abu Ghraib wearing the uniform of your country.

The soldiers of Abu Ghraib are not an "offshoot" of me.  If they were, I'd have reacted the same as the Military, the actual organization the soldiers were an offshoot of, did....condemn their actions, and make it clear they were not part of any sanctioned policy.

So yea, under the current circumstances being discussed, they absolutely had an obligation to condemn actions of those that were assocated with their organization.  Otherwise the perception is that of tacit support/agreement, if not actual sanctioning

[BT]

BT...like I said who knows?
The IslamoNazis that want to take over the world come in all forms.
It takes alot of different players to put the ball in the endzone.
They aren't all strapping suicide vests on....
Some play different roles so they can reach their goals
They are good at "hiding"
In fact that's what makes them so difficult to beat
My niece died of leukemia a few years ago...
The doctor told us the cancer would run hide in her brain when he cranked up the poison (chemo)
The leukemia knew it could hide in the brain because the doc couldn't poison the brain
The IslamoNazis do the same....they blend in...they hide...they shoot rockets from schools...
In my mind they have the same goal as the cancer....kill the host.

And all I'm saying is that if the Muslim Brotherhood was behind the killing of Sadat, then it would seem to be important to the accuser that they were in fact behind it, and not some third cousin removed.

And if they were behind the assassination shouldn't they be on the terror list? If not, why not?
Perhaps we should investigate that.

[BT]

Actually a question just as important, if not more so, is did MB itself condemn the act, publically distancing themselves from the actions of a completely indep group, with a different philosophy

The Muslim Brotherhood is under no obligation to condemn actions it is not responsible for, just as you are under no obligation to condemn the actions of a few at Abu Ghraib wearing the uniform of your country.

The soldiers of Abu Ghraib are not an "offshoot" of me.  If they were, I'd have reacted the same as the Military, the actual organization the soldiers were an offshoot of, did....condemn their actions, and make it clear they were not part of any sanctioned policy.

So yea, under the current circumstances being discussed, they absolutely had an obligation to condemn actions of those that were assocated with their organization.  Otherwise the perception is that of tacit support/agreement, if not actual sanctioning

You are a US citizen are you not?
The soldiers at Abu Ghraib were US citizens were they not?
Is that not a common link?


I anxiously await your denouncements.