<<WE elect a student of Saul Alinski to the Presidency . . . >>
Cut the bullshit, plane. What is this "student of Saul Alinsky" crap? You think Obama was some kind of disciple who sat at Alinski's feet for 12 years absorbing the wisdom of the Master? There's no solid connection between Alinski and Obama and if there was, Alinski was a teacher of methodology more than of socialist economics and policies.
<< . . . elect a solid Democrat Senate and House >>
Solid, my ass. What's so "solid" about Blue Dog Democrats? What's so "solid" about Lieberman? There was no "solid" anything, just a bunch of Republocrats posing as agents of "change" and "hope" to fool the dumb fucking electorate one more time. Billion dollar bailouts of banks, insurance companies and financiers, just the way Alinski had it all planned, eh?
<< . . . and you think that the Liberal message has gotten no hearing?>>
Yes, I do. There was NOBODY making the case for single payer. There was NOBODY making the case for universal coverage. The closest the case for single payer ever got was "public option," a pathetically watered-down version of single-payer, and even that was back-pedalled away from at breakneck speed by Obama and every fucking "Democrat" who was supposedly for "health care reform." Instead of reasoned debate, instead of veteran Canadian plan administrators to make the case for Canadian-style health care, the MSM blanketed the nation with coverage of the moronic "town hall meetings" and "tea parties" where speakers were routinely shouted down by morons with "Hear Our Voice!" till nothing but the chant could be heard. I SAW THAT. There were fake TV ads by this lying fat bitch who claimed that Canadian health care almost killed her by not operating on her "brain tumor" which turned out in the end to be a benign cyst. A Niagara of lies and bullshit hijacked the public debate on health care, and that was because the entire public debate was mediated by the MSM which made God-damned sure that the waters were muddied enough for the GOP to play on the fears of the ignorant and the uneducated, as they always do, to ensure that REAL health care reform never even got put on the table.
<<You think that corporate America has no libs?,... How do you classify Warren Buffet?...Or all those guys that give millions to Democratic Congressmen?>>
Who gives a shit about corporate America's lone libs? Soros? Buffet? BFD. At the end of the day, you judge the bozos they put in Congress with their campaign contributions. Democrats for whom "impeachment is off the table" and no stink raised in the MSM. A law-school President who says he can't prosecute Bush-era torturers because "that would be looking backward." EVERY FUCKING PROSECUTION OF EVERY FUCKING CRIME IN THE WORLD HAS TO BE "LOOKING BACKWARD" BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY PROSECUTE CRIMES AFTER THEY HAVE TAKEN PLACE and yet not one major MSM outlet raised a stink about this. A Democratic "anti-war" majority which refused to cut funding for the war. This whole "liberal/conservative" divide is a crock, it's all one side.
<<This is like,...... far beyond delusion.>>
Oh GROW UP for christ sake.
<<Even our media is top loaded with Liberals , but still the liberal message is not being well presented?>>
Oh really? So what MSM "top-loaded with Liberals" was calling on Pelosi to impeach Bush for lying the country into the war? Which one was calling for the new Democratic majority to de-fund the war? Which one is calling for immediate abandonment of all Iraqi bases and all troops out in six months? Which one is protesting drone attacks? Which one is demanding trials for Bush-era torturers? Tell me, please?
"Far beyond delusion?" You're God-damn right, YOU are "far beyond delusion."
<<I think you can do better than that.>>
Thanks, I'm very flattered.
<<Or maybe you can't , the president Himself pretty much said the same thing in his state of the union speech, promiseing to speak slower .>>
Tell the President, it isn't how slow or fast he talks, it's whether he's making the "changes" that he promised or whether he's lying. Tell him that slow or fast, ANY prosecution of ANY crime has to be "looking backward" and he'd better find a better explanation for his refusal to prosecute any of the Bush-era war criminals than he's come up with so far. Otherwise I won't see any "change" with regard to the issue of torture and I'll think he's been lying to the people.
<<I think Kruthammner has your number>>
You're as dead wrong on that as you were about everything else that you posted here. I'VE got Krauthammer's number.