I followed your link but I can't make head or tail of it. Some fucking lunatic is calling for the killing of cracker babies, some guy (the same lunatic or someone else???) is charged with voter intimidation or maybe two guys are charged. I couldn't see the connection between the guy calling for the killing of cracker babies with the voter intimidation guys - - was he physically the same person as one of the two guys, and even if he was, it seemed to me that the "kill cracker babies" remark was not made near a polling booth so it's hard to see how this is voter intimidation. And in any event the second guy was NOT calling for the killing of cracker babies.
Sounds like the usual suspects (right-wing racist nut cases) trying to whip up hysteria through guilt by association in their usual muddled way. Probably there was no case for voter intimidation or the whole case fell apart and Holder backed off, while all the right-wing fruitcakes are busy trying to link the accused to the "kill cracker babies" guy or link a speech which had no possible connection to voter intimidation to the actual charges.
And then somehow prove that (through the innuendo of the non-existent "links") to prove that Obama was protecting the "kill cracker babies" guy.