The fact that all you seem capable of discussing is about how BAD Democrats are and how there is a CONSPIRACY to take away your guns and let gay people MARRY one another and actually call it a marriage has everything to do with your obsessive personality.
See? It's practically genetic. You immediately have to inject something no one is talking about and/or other hot button political issues that have nothing to do with the current topic. I'm no more "obsessive" than you are at discussing how BAD Republicans are, and how there is an OLIGARCHY to take away your dollars, and force women to have children, and actually dare to call a fetus an unborn child....demonstrates precisely the same supposed obsessive personality.
And all of it, irrelevent to the topic at handPerhaps you could explain how Bill Clinton getting a huge speaker's fee in return for some Russian company buying a Canadian company that owns an American company is going to harm anyone in this country.
That's easy.....flip parties. If you had a Republican receiving huge speaker's fees, while their Republican spouse was in a position of political influence to facilitate deals that shower themselves with millions of $$$$ in "donations"......and then fail to even disclose it on your taxes, and you'd be going apesnot, at what else they would do
In other words, its all about buying politicians and the power they can peddle. PRECISELY that which you condemn those evil Republicans of doing. Here, you have Billary doing it in spades, but apparently that can be justified because............?
Every President since Reagan has cashed in on huge speakers fees.
Its not about the fees. Bill can get $5 million in speaker fees, if someone wants to pay him for it. I could care less. It has to do with the power of the politician at the other end. It would appear that Bill wouldn't have received such a nice Russian speaker fee, if it weren't for the wife, running the State Dept, that gave it the thumbs' up. And poof, there's not just a nice speaking fee, but millions more $$$'s "donated" to their foundation, from the folks who were directly benefited from the uranium transfer. And there's no politician more powerful than the President of the U.S. If you can buy that.........well, there you go.
I don't see how this is must different from Taylor Swift getting paid for singing her songs or Ann Coulter writing her books.
That's because you're having a clash between your efforts to rationalize what you'd condemn Republicans for doing and the ongoing support of the ends justifying the means. Neither Coulter nor Swift are in a position to push anything, outside their books & CD's. And even then, that's voluntary purchasing of their products. Best stick with the latter, so you won't look like such a hypocrite