<<You initially said that either you or Cindy had to be wrong. Later on you said that you were speaking of "Aristotelian truth" - ie, fact. When I pointed out that your and Cindy's disagreement was opinion, and not fact, you pulled out the "Biblical truth" claim.>>
That was my mistake. An opinion on a theological matter does not have to be subjected to Aristotelian logic in order to be found wrong or false. Perhaps the only possible Aristotelian judgment on any theological opinion is "insufficient data." If subjected to the standards of the Bible, which are NOT Aristotelian, one man's opinion can in fact be found to be wrong, and another man's, right.
Looks like I was badly confused.