Again, trying to make this about me, when I could care less. It's not about what you'd say that I may like or wouldn't like. Xo, you have 3 pathological traits when it comes to "debating" politics, when its with people that don't agree with you:
1)
Deflect, it's your 1st responder, start arguing points that were never made, distract, present irrational/illogical/hyperbolic extremes, then hammer on them, as if that's the supposed point or issue being discussed
This would also include your perpetual effort to make me your go to response, when unable to support your own claims/accusations. Like commenting that you're not here to try to make me happy or that you become credible to me
2)
Literalism, I know, that's not a real word, but it's you taking some point being made rhetorically, and literally apply it or argue it. Of course, that's then leads back to the above effort at deflection, where you focus on that, because it makes no sense....which it wouldn't. Perfect examples being the recent discussion on "open borders", or when taxation arguments come up, and you infer that the other side's argument is to abolish all taxes. Or when the gun issue comes up, where you tend to infer that the opponents' argument is that everyone be made to have/carry a gun.
3)
Insult, the knee jerk attempt to make every response some mean-spirited, demeaning, if not hateful response. I mean, you even do it to plane, of all people. Heaven forbid a conservative Christian republican were to address you. You can be just as hateful & vile, in your responses, as you claim Coulter is
You can generally find either 1 in one of your responses, if not all 3, the latest examples being in this thread alone.
------------------------------------------------------
Try going back to where your thought process derailed with the MB injection. I realize that initially it was some weak effort to pin the current Middle East debacle, specifically Iraq, Syria & ISIS, & blaming it on Bush (no surprise there)
But when I credibly was referencing actual points regarding Radical Islam, as the source (not Democrats, not even Obama, only that current policies have exacerbated it), out of no where came the MB & Oklahoma nonsense.
If that was supposed to be a "logical extreme" to my position, you didn't bother to demonstrate how. It's like a dog seeing a squirrel........."SQUIRREL".
Seriously, TRY TO MAKE AN EFFORT......and no, not an effort to please me, in any way, simply to make sense of what you're trying to claim. Take the Oklahoma deflection, and try to explain, how on earth, that's a logical connection to the point I was making about Radical Islam's growing #'s & root source of terrorism, as exemplified by ISIS
Or not, and just go back to 1), 2), and/or 3) Doesn't matter to me. Just trying to help you out